Dry EDM Process
The Dry EDM is
a “green” environment friendly EDM technique in which a gas is used at high
pressure as the dielectric medium instead of mineral oil based dielectric. This
method also leads to various other advantages on the overall process.
Introduction to Dry EDM:
Dry Electrical discharge machining (Dry EDM) is
performed in a gas atmosphere. It typically used gases like air, oxygen, argon,
helium, nitrogen or a gas mixture as dielectric. This gas based dielectric is
injected inside the tool electrode at high pressure which removes the debris
from working gap and helps in cooling the tool electrode and workpiece. It
eliminates all environmental hazard risks and at the same time promotes
operator’s health.
Difference
between Conventional and Dry EDM:
Dry EDM
Conventional
EDM |
Dry EDM |
Kerosene, deionized water etc. used as dielectric
fluid. |
Helium, nitrogen, argon etc. used as dielectric fluid. |
Spark generated in liquid medium. |
Spark generated in gaseous medium. |
Dielectric fluid can be reused. Usually cooled down
and cleaned before next operation. |
Dielectric gas is not recycled. Hence, cleaning and
cooling apparatus is not required. |
Liquid dielectric is a good coolant. High thermal
capacity. |
Gaseous dielectric is a poor coolant. Low thermal
capacity. |
Cost of dielectric fluid is comparatively high. |
Gas based dielectrics are cheaper. |
Liquid dielectric posses high risk of environment
pollution and operator health hazards. |
Gaseous dielectrics eliminate environment pollution
risks. |
Liquid dielectric prevents atmospheric oxygen to
come in contact with hot sparking zone and avoids oxidation. |
High chances of oxide layer formation on hot machined
surface during machining of ferrous materials. |
Machining
setup of Dry EDM:
The setup
includes a dry EDM unit attached to the machining head. Here, the gas is filled
through a free-wheeling bush. In order to seal the gas inlet region, two o-rings
were mounted the shaft. To prevent the eccentric rotation of the electrode a
ceramic pipe guide is provided.
Processes
parameters:
The input parameters are current, pulse on-time (ton), pulse
off-time (toff), duty factor, electrode rotational speed, pressure
and the type of gas used as dielectric.
The duty factor (DF) can be calculated by:
DF = ton/(ton+toff)
The output parameters include process responses like:
Material removal rate (MRR): It is the amount of
material removed per unit time(usually taken in minutes).
Tool wear rate (TWR): Tool wear is the weight losses
in the electrode to capture the extent of wear.
Surface roughness (Ra): It is the measure
of finely spaced irregularities of the surface texture.
Radial overcut (ROC).
Factors
affecting processes responses:
Effect of gas type on MRR:
Compared
to air and oxygen, mixture of air and argon shows the highest material removal
rate. This is because argon in the mixture has higher viscosity and density
which leads to a narrower plasma channel that focuses its energy on smaller
area and creates a greater crater depth.
Graph 1: MRR v/s Current; Graph 2: MRR v/s Tool rotational speed.
Effect of input parameters on MRR:
The MRR is directly proportional to the current. This is due to the increase in
pulse energy by increasing current which leads to higher heat transfer rate in
the spark zone.
The pulse on
time (ton) is directly proportional with the MRR. However this
relation is not linear. Increasing pulse on time leads to higher pulse energy.
Similarly, the
MRR is directly proportional to the duty factor.
The MRR
increases with an increase in gas pressure as it creates a better flushing
condition.
The MRR initially increase with the increase in electrode rotational speed. But on much higher speeds the discharge may be interrupted by the movement of tool during the pulse on time. This leads to a decrease in MRR. (Graph 2)
Effect of gas type on Ra:
Nitrogen has the minimum Ra compared to air and argon air mixture.
This is due to the lower viscosity which leads to lower crater depth and hence
Ra decrease.
Effect of input parameters on Ra:
The Ra value decreases with an increase in current.
Higher the pulse
on time, deeper the crater will be. This could result in higher Ra
values.
Effect of MRR on Radial overcut (ROC):
Higher MRR will lead to an increase in ROC as it places more debris between the
machined hole and the tool electrode hence there is occurrence of spark between
these particles and the workpiece.
Effect of flushing condition on ROC:
Better flushing conditions could reduce ROC to a great extent as fewer
particles will be placed between the crater and electrode wall.
Effect of gas type on ROC:
Amongst
nitrogen, air and air argon mixture, nitrogen gas showed the lowest ROC values.
This is due to its low viscosity which leads to low concentration of plasma
channel. This in turn leads to a decrease in effective pulses.
Effect of input parameters on ROC:
Higher current leads to higher ROC as current is directly proportional to MRR.
As pulse on time
increases, ROC increases. This is due to the increase in MRR and plasma channel
expansion.
Increasing gas
pressure will help in decreasing ROC due to better flushing conditions.
Advantages
of Dry EDM machining:
·
Eliminates
risk of environmental pollution: Dry EDM is said to be a ‘green’ environment
friendly EDM process as there are no toxic fumes generated.
·
No
fire hazard: Ensures safety in the machine surroundings.
·
Decreased
dielectric medium costs.
·
Lower
tool wear rate: In Dry EDM, as the removed material gets deposited on the
electrode, a protective carbon layer is shaped. This leads to near zero or in
some cases negative tool wear rate.
·
Lower
residual stresses.
·
Smaller
Heat affected zone (HAZ).
·
Electrolytic
corrosion of workpiece is avoided (in comparison with liquid dielectrics).
·
Arbitrary
machining directions are possible, regardless of gravity due to the absence of
dielectric tank.
·
Lower
material removal rate: Although Dry EDM proves to be a promising EDM technology
with a number of advantages over the traditional EDM process like lower tool
wear rate, thin recast layer and general overall environment friendliness; as
this processes experiences unconstrained plasma expansion, it acts as a barrier
in achieving desirable material removal rate.
·
Poor
surface quality: As liquid dielectric fluids are better coolants than gaseous
dielectrics, the workpiece being machined in dry EDM experiences higher surface
temperatures which lead to poor surface quality.
·
Decreased
spark intensity: This is caused due to a comparatively lower breakdown voltage
for the gaseous dielectric.
The following solutions were proposed to improve the
material removal rates in a Dry EDM:
1) Use of electrodes with peripheral slots.
Ineffective debris disposal is a major factor
hindering the performance of Dry EDMs. Providing peripheral slots to the
electrode will ensure more space for the flow of dielectric for effective
debris disposal and thus improving the material removal rate (MRR).
2)
Introducing
oxygen into the dielectric gas mixture.
Electron negativity of oxygen was a major factor
in improving the material removal rate. Experimental results stated that oxygen
mixed Dry EDM showed a 200% increase in the material removal rate compared to
the conventional Dry EDM process.
The conventional EDM is a commercially exploited process which provides various excellent machining characteristics like good surface finish, machining of complex geometries etc. On the contrary, the conventional EDM poses a threat to the environment due to the highly toxic gases produced and could cause severe health hazards to the operator.
The Dry EDM is a potential alternative process which
eliminates all kinds of environmental threats and carries out ‘green’
environment friendly machining. However, there are certain performance
drawbacks in Dry EDM regarding the material removal rates and surface finish.
Currently researches are being carried out and certain solutions have been
proposed to improve these parameters. With these improvements the Dry EDM is a
candidate to be used as an alternate environment friendly process.
References:
[1] L. Liqinga, S. Yingjieb, Study of dry EDM with oxygen-mixed and cryogenic cooling approaches, Harbin Institute of Technology, No.92 West Dazhi St., Harbin, 150001, China
[2] Saman Fattahi and Hamid Baseri, Analysis of dry electrical discharge machining in different dielectric mediums.
Neeraj and Kirad op🔥🔥🔥
ReplyDeleteSuperb !!!!!
ReplyDeleteVery interesting and explanatory blog. The diagrams helped me for better understanding and the blog is presented with many diagrams which makes this blog easy to understand.
ReplyDeleteVery informative and well explained!
ReplyDeleteNice work done 👍🏽 looking forward to more blogs
ReplyDeleteVery informative.
ReplyDeleteGreat content!!
Keep it up! 👍
Very informative
ReplyDeleteCovered all the contents
Great work👍
Very informative 👍
ReplyDeleteA great blog which covers all aspects related to the topic
ReplyDeleteKeep it up
Great content
ReplyDeleteVery informative
Nice information👍🏻👍🏻
ReplyDeleteVery informative
ReplyDeleteVery well written
ReplyDeletePellucid and exhaustive content. Keep writing about more technical topics like this.💯
ReplyDeleteNice Work!!
ReplyDeletenice
ReplyDelete